Notwithstanding the idiot psychologist at UWO who a few years ago(using faulty science, which was the real problem) universally linked head size and IQ with race, it seems (see a British study published last fall) there is quite a link between brain size at birth and subsequent growth rates of the brain in young'uns, and cognitive ability throughout one's life; faster thinking for the big brained kids, while indeed those will smaller brains suffered greater cognitive decline with old age.
This all popped into my own smallish head when I found myself last evening explaining to a non-English-as-a-first language person the phrase "Don't let the little head think for the big one." Like the research has confirmed, inevitably, the big head does all the good thinking, proving its superior intellect. But the little head is a pushy prick.
So, I find myself in a relationship in which the parties involved (ah, me et him) are separated by some 10,500 miles. The distance between the downtown cores of Seoul, SK and Toronto. He is, as the mean bitch fate would have it, someone about whom I find myself thinking in future tense. Not incidental for someone like myself who often has mental fantasies about the horrid and searing breakup, before the first cum towel is dried.
The practical thing over such distance in a relationship would be to forget any sense of physical ownership. Um, we should fuck who we want when separated by such distance and what will be months and months and months of time. "Gawd, it's only sex, go for it." That for me it turns out, however, is the little head thinking.
Not to be presumptuous, but I had a clear opportunity to have sex with a beautiful and engaging friend this past weekend -- no strings attached. Two self-described lonely people wanting simply to toss some fluids about. But I couldn't do it despite an overwhelming physical WANT to do it. Aiiiiieeeeyah!
It's not about morality, which I would define as a universal or big "g" Good. I just don't have those kinds of hangups about sex -- I did, after all, implore my GP to write "slut" in my file after our first meeting (I have discovered he did not as the College would, it seems, frown upon such unprofessional behaviour -- the humourless, regulatory bastards!). But having sex with someone else other than the he that I am in love with (10,500 miles as the Boeing flies or not)is wrong for ME. If it were a moral wrong, I would be judgmental of my non-monogamous friends and I am not. I don't think they are doing anying Wrong. Further, in my own case, and importantly, it is wrong for my "him" too -- in a couple of senses. He too feels it wrong for him to find boink beyond the relationship, and I would find it hurtful if he did so.
Monogamy in my world is a gift I expect and give. A defining gift, in fact. Without it, for me, there is no relationship, really. I have softened in this regard, in some ways, with time. In the past if anyone cheated on me they be "out the door" no explanations wanted or needed, thank you very much. Now I understand that "mistakes" can happen, even deliberate ones with myriad and wonderful justifications. But to sanction those mistakes from the get-go. Well, that continues to confuse me.
With the little head's insistence I sought permission for having sex with others. It was granted. So, this weekend I would not have been cheating as after all I had permission. But I have come to realize one can't gain permission to justify away what one believes is hurfully wrong for one's self and for the one whom you define as the last person to whom you want to bring pain.
Bluntly I understand it wasn't permission I was seeking, but the exact opposite -- I wanted to hear that he felt the same way as I did and in subsequent conversation have learned that indeed I was told what he thought I wanted to hear. My asking (and thus belief I had decided) was a great disappointment for him, as was his "go ahead, just don't tell me about it" for me.
What has since transpired is a firm declaration that I don't want him to have sex with others and he doesn't want me to have sex with others and we will do what we can to honour that promise.
The truly funny part of this was his telling me today that he felt so sorry for me after our discussion. As if going a period of time without sex will damage me somehow. HA! That really put things in perspective for me. How silly. It IS just sex afterall, to use that phrase in a more appropriate context.
So, rhetoric, belief and behaviour are all in sync, for the moment.
So long as the little head doesn't win the argument, some lonely DSB-haunted night :)
Steve